Showing posts with label video. Show all posts
Showing posts with label video. Show all posts

Saturday, 11 February 2012

Recent example of Select Committee Oral Evidence, scrutiny and e-democracy in one.


On 31 January the Education Committee held an oral evidence session with Secretary of State for Education Michael Gove. MPs on the Committee wanted to ensure that their questions reflected the most pressing concerns in the world of education so asked the public via twitter ‘What one education policy question do you think the Committee should ask Michael Gove?’ Twitter users were asked to submit their question by tagging it with the hashtag #AskGove.

Here is being asked to justify the possibility of expanding grammar schools in Kent.

 In the interests of political balance here is a video of Michael Gove falling over.

Q: What recent developments have given MPs greater power to control what they debate? A: The Backbench Business Committee



The Backbench Business Committee has been running since 2010. It gives MPs a chance to suggest debates outside the usual ways. These debates are sometimes held in the Commons chamber or in the rooms around Westminster Hall. It is also the way body that decides which e-petitions (over 100,000 signatures) go to debate.

 Remember:


  • The  Backbench Business Committee is just one way that British governments have responded to recent political scandals that have undermined the credibility of British democracy over the last 15 years, such as the  cash for questions (vid),  cash for honours and the expenses scandal.
  • The  Backbench Business Committee is given slots of time by the government. No time given = no MP say on debates. The government still has ultimate control here, but the coalition who created the committee is clearly trying to appear to be giving more say to backbench MPs and to respond more to public demands for debate. 
  • E-petitions with 100,000 or 50 million signature DO NOT have to be debated. There is no law that says they have to be. It is still up to the committee, and they have limited time given over to them by the government.
  • These debates do not lead to a change in law.
  • It is not a Select Committee, as it doesn't follow the work of a particular government department.

What's wrong with adjournment debates?
The usual way of MPs getting a debate is through adjournment debates - but these are at the end of the Parliamentary day, poorly attended and with a low reputation. The Backbench Business Committee was created to give MP and public choices for debate a higher profile. 

How are Bills passed in Parliament?

How do Select Committees help scrutinise the government and help ensure democracy?